Fine Japanese Calligraphy

The Art of Master Japanese Calligrapher Eri Takase

0
Visa, Mastercard, AmEx, PayPal accepted
Home › Library › Philology › Correct Shooting, Correct Hit

正射正中 seisha seichū Correct Shooting, Correct Hit

This is a philological study of the Japanese kyūdō maxim 正射正中 (seisha seichū), correct shooting, correct hit, a minority form of a phrase the archery federation writes as 正射必中. It spans the record from the classical ground in the Record of Rites and Mencius, through every Japanese archery book of 1918 to 1942 that states the idea in prose without the four characters, to the phrase's first print appearance after the war and its English rendering, which traces to one anonymous Wikipedia sentence of 2005, and it examines why a maxim that sounds ancient is, on the print record, no older than the postwar kyūdō federation.

Japanese Scroll of Correct Shooting, Correct Hit (seisha seichū) — Calligraphy by Eri Takase
Correct Shooting, Correct Hit (seisha seichū)

Correct Shooting, Correct Hit (seisha seichū) on a traditional Japanese Scroll by Master Eri Takase.

View Scroll ›

Abstract

正射正中, seisha seichū, correct shooting, correct hit, is a minority form of a Japanese kyūdō maxim whose standard written form is 正射必中, seisha hitchū, the All Nippon Kyudo Federation's own words for the discipline's ideal. Neither four-character form appears in print before 1946; the idea itself is twenty-three centuries old, stated in the Record of Rites and Mencius and quoted in plain prose by every Japanese archery book from 1918 to 1942. The standard form enters the library catalogue in 1968 and a book title in 1992, most likely coined in the federation's own postwar manuals, while the minority form has no print record at all and lives only in a handful of Japanese web pages from 2017 to 2020. The English rendering, Correct Shooting is Correct Hitting, traces word for word to one anonymous sentence added to the English Wikipedia's kyūdō article on 27 February 2005.

Overview

The sense. The maxim of Japanese archery: shoot correctly and the hit follows; attend to the form, not the target. So the two forms say nearly the same thing: correct shooting hits correctly, or correct shooting hits without fail.

The words. Seisha seichū; the standard form of the maxim is 正射必中 seisha hitchū. 正射 is correct shooting, and it is the discipline's own word. The general dictionaries know 正射 only as frontal fire, first cited from a war memoir of 1913, and as the mathematician's orthogonal projection; neither has the archer's sense, and the standard Japanese-English dictionary has no entry at all [1]. In kyūdō writing the word means shooting that follows the form, and the older books say it in plain Japanese instead, 正しい射, 正しき射形, 射の正法. The Chinese word is older than any of this: in the Spring and Autumn Annals of Wu and Yue, the king of Yue asks his archery master 願聞正射之道, tell me the way of correct shooting, and the master answers with the whole posture of the crossbowman, body like a board, head like a struck egg, the right hand releases and the left hand does not know it [2]. 中 is to hit, the target's word since the Record of Rites [3]. The form's second word, 正中, is correct hit, with the dictionary sense of 正中 that Fukuzawa used, right and ideal, and the ordinary sense, dead center, both available to a reader [1]. The standard form's second word, 必中, is a sure hit, 必ず命中すること, the word of 一発必中; the big dictionary first cites it from a 1963 novel, which is a thousand years late, because 必中 is already the Rites' own phrase for the archer whose every movement hits the mark of ritual [1][3].

The text in English. The English came from a website, and the house's English is that sentence.

The historical record

The Chinese ground. 禮記 射義, the Meaning of Archery chapter of the Record of Rites: 故射者，進退周還必中禮，內志正，外體直，然後持弓矢審固；持弓矢審固，然後可以言中；此可以觀德行矣 — the archer's advancing, retiring and turning must all hit the mark of ritual; the will within correct, the body without straight, then he holds bow and arrow steady and sure; only then can one speak of hitting; and by this one may see his virtue. And: 射者，仁之道也。射求正諸己，己正而後發，發而不中，則不怨勝己者，反求諸己而已矣 — archery is the way of humaneness: the archer seeks correctness in himself; correct in himself, then he releases; if he releases and misses, he does not resent the one who beat him, but turns and seeks the cause in himself [3]. Mencius has the same sentence, 仁者如射：射者正己而後發, the humane man is like the archer: he makes himself correct, and then releases [4]. The Doctrine of the Mean has the short form every Japanese archer learned: 射有似乎君子。失諸正鵠，反求諸其身 — archery is like the gentleman: when he misses the mark, he seeks the cause in himself [5]. Confucius in the Analects adds 射不主皮, in archery the point is not piercing the hide [6].

Japan before the four characters, 1918 to 1942. The pre-war archery books carry the whole idea in prose and never the four characters. A Heki-school manual of 1918: 矢は心の通る所に中るべし。體は心に隨ふ物なり … 射るときは必ず中るべし。若し心納らざる時は體落ちつかず。體落ちつかざる時は弓隨はず、弓隨はざるときは中りなし — the arrow hits where the mind goes; the body follows the mind; shoot so, and you will surely hit; when the mind is not settled the body is unsettled, when the body is unsettled the bow does not follow, when the bow does not follow there is no hit [7]. Another book of 1918 quotes the Mean for it and adds the honest rider that even the straight body does not hit every time [8]. The First Higher School's archers, in the school history of 1925, wrote their creed: 射は的中を目標とすべきに非ず、凡そ我等中てんとして的に向ふは邪道なり … 正しき射により神の域に入る悅 … 中りを以て輸贏を爭ふを目指すは邪道なり — shooting must not have the hit as its goal; to face the target meaning to hit is a false way; the joy of entering the gods' realm through correct shooting; to aim at winning by hits is a false way — and closed with the Mean's line [9]. A 1924 dojo's motto was 射即人生, shooting is life [10]. 小林治道's Seven Ways of the Chikurin School (1931) says the maxim in one sentence: 此七道を習學して其理を究め其業を練つて射法に熟達すれば其射は必ず中るといふことが當然である — master these seven ways, exhaust their principle, train the work, and it follows of course that the shooting will surely hit [11]; its preface has shooting is the way of humaneness, the gentleman's contest, and it prints a commentary on the 射義 as an appendix. 竹内尉's secondary-school Kyūdō Reader (1937) prints the three classics in Japanese reading, divides hits into 偶中, chance hits, and 眞中, true hits (even if it hits, this is not a true hit but a chance hit, a hit of the moment, with no content and no value), warns against 的中主義, hit-ism, as a false way, and states the mechanism as a fact about the range: 現在の射場は自己を正しくして矢を發すれば、的中する如き構造になつてゐる … 體勢が正しく、心が靜かであれば、矢は活物の如く的に達する — the present range is built so that if you correct yourself and release, you hit; when the body is correct and the mind quiet, the arrow reaches the target like a living thing [12]. The women's manual of 1938: 初心者には中りは第二として、正しき射形を會得させることを第一 — for beginners, hitting second, learning the correct form first [13]. A 1939 book: 射の結果は己れの射の正不正の反映である … 盡して求めざる心 — the result of the shot is the reflection of the correctness or incorrectness of one's shooting; the mind that gives everything and seeks nothing [14]. And a 1942 bibliography of old Heki-school manuscripts records one that opens with the Rites' sentence and then insists 弓の魂と云は中り也, the soul of the bow is the hit [15]. Whether the idea was already four characters in speech in those years is not on record in print; the Japanese encyclopedia's article on 阿波研造, Herrigel's teacher, says his teaching was to practice the natural release, bow and body as one, and 正射必中 thoroughly, without a source for the phrase [16].

The four characters, after the war. On the National Diet Library's full-text index of the printed books to 1945, 正射必中 returns nothing and 正射正中 returns nothing, beside thousands of hits for 正射 and 必中 alone and hundreds for the Rites' 內志正; the absence is a measurement [17]. The library's catalogue first indexes 正射必中 in 1968, in two issues of the Tokyo police magazine 自警 [18], and first as a title in 1992, a Hokkaido archery club's sixtieth-anniversary volume 正射必中 [19]. The All Nippon Kyudo Federation, founded 1949, issued its Kyūdō Manual, volume one, in August 1953, the likeliest first printed home of the phrase. Today the federation's own page says it plainly: 弓道には正射必中という言葉があります。これは正しい射法で射られた矢は、必ず中るという意味です — in kyūdō there is the phrase 正射必中; it means that an arrow shot with correct shooting will surely hit [20]. The one general dictionary that has the phrase, Weblio's 実用日本語表現辞典, defines it 「正しい射法で射れば矢は必ず的に当たる」という、弓道の理念・心構えを示す語 and notes its second life as a business motto, act rightly and the results follow; the catalogue's 33 titles with the phrase include a sales-magazine serial of the late 2010s titled 正射必中! and a 2024 title 正射必中!弓道部 [21].

The minority form, 2017 to 2020. 正射正中 has no known print record: none on the full-text index, none in the national catalogue, none on the Japanese Wikipedia, none in the dictionaries. It lives in speech and online. A kyūdō blog of 12 October 2020: 正射正中とは、読んで字の如くではあるけれど、道理にかなった〔正〕弓の引き方〔射〕をすれば、間違いなく〔正〕的にあたる〔中〕ということで … これとよく似た『正射必中』という言葉もある — 正射正中 means, as the characters say, that if you draw the bow in the way that accords with reason, you will hit the target correctly; there is also the very similar phrase 正射必中 [22]. A questioner on Yahoo!知恵袋 in May 2017 uses it as the opposite of あて射, hitting by aiming, and asks how to be said to shoot 正射正中 rather than that [23]. A 2020 blog heads a post 正射必中・正射正中 and treats the two as one, from a television interview with Godiva Japan's president, an archer [24]. This, then, is the minority form of a real maxim, read by the archers who use it as correct shooting, correct hit, with the second 正 doing the work that 必 does in the standard form.

Today, the romaji. This romaji, seisha seichū, is right for its characters. The standard form reads seisha hitchū; neither form is in the standard Japanese-English dictionary, and the sense it carries lives only in the discipline.

What is not a source. Not the 射法訓, the Principles of Shooting of 吉見順正, and not the 禮記 射義 as a text: the federation prints both as its two founding texts, and neither contains the four characters; the maxim is the discipline's summary of them [3][15]. Not 阿波研造 on the evidence here: the attribution to him is a Wikipedia sentence without a source, and no print of his decade carries the phrase [16]. Not Zen: the pre-war books ground it in the Confucian classics, and the Zen framing of kyūdō in English is Herrigel's and later.

The word in English

2005, and 2008, and 2022. The English Wikipedia. On 27 February 2005 an anonymous editor added to the English Wikipedia's article on kyūdō the line However, the highest ideal of kyudo is "seisha seichu", "correct shooting is correct hitting", romaji only, no characters; by 2007 it read the goal most devotees of kyūdō seek is seisha seichu, which it still reads [25]. In July 2008 a second editor added the standard form beside it, seisha hitchu, "true shooting, certain hitting" [26], and only in July 2022 did an editor add the characters 正射正中 to the older sentence [27].

1993 to 2020. Before and after the encyclopedia. Before Wikipedia the English kyūdō books had the standard form: Onuma Hideharu with Dan and Jackie DeProspero, Kyudo: The Essence and Practice of Japanese Archery (Kodansha International, 1993), page 2: the distinction between skillful shooting and correct shooting. Skillful shooting is always accurate, but so is correct shooting, and shooting that is correct and right-minded (seishahichu); the index reads noshahichu (skillful shooting) [28]. David E. Jones, Martial Arts Training in Japan (Tuttle, 2001) gives the federation's two texts their English names, the Shahokun (Principles of Shooting) by Master Yoshimi Junsei and the Raiki Shagi (Record of Etiquette, Truth of Shooting) [29]. Jérôme Chouchan, Target: Business Wisdom from the Ancient Japanese Martial Art of Kyudo (LID, 2018): Kyudo has a particular teaching: 'Right shooting always results in a hit' [30]. Every known English book with seisha seichu postdates 2005 and repeats Wikipedia's sentence: a war novel of 2007 ("Seisha seichu, General Anami. 'Correct shooting is correct hitting'") [31], a mass-market Art of War of 2008 (followers of kyudo adhere to the philosophy of seisha seichu, which translates to "correct shooting is correct hitting") [32], a children's novel of 2020 [33]. Hoff's Kyudo: The Way of the Bow (2002) and the Nippon Budokan's Budo (2009) do not use the romaji.

Today. The house's title Correct Shooting, Correct Hit and its sentence Correct Shooting is Correct Hitting are the 2005 Wikipedia rendering of the house's own four characters, and a good one; they are not a translation of 正射必中, whose English is correct shooting, certain hit. One idea, three ages. In the Rites and Mencius it is moral: correctness is sought in oneself, the release follows, and a miss sends the archer back to himself, not to his rival; that is why archery is the way of humaneness. In the Japanese books of 1918 to 1942 it is pedagogical and a little polemical: form first, hits second; a hit without form is a chance hit; hit-ism is a false way; and yet, a Heki manuscript insists, the soul of the bow is the hit, and a 1939 author says the result is the mirror of the form. The postwar four characters compress that into a slogan, and the discipline still argues inside it: Onuma's 1993 book distinguishes skillful shooting, 能射必中, which is always accurate, from correct shooting, 正射必中, which is accurate too but for the right reason, and a 1985 Tsukuba master complained that the spirit-first reading had poisoned a generation into despising the hit. The catalogue's if we focus on correct technique then the end result will take care of itself is the maxim's ordinary modern sense and is true to all three ages.

A reading

This form is correct, and it is the minority one. 正射正中 is natural Japanese that Japanese archers use; but the maxim as the federation writes it, as the library catalogue's titles carry it, and as the one dictionary that has it defines it, is 正射必中, seisha hitchū. Someone who wants the kyūdō maxim on silk or in skin should know which form the discipline writes. The ground is older and better than the slogan: the will within correct, the body without straight, and only then can one speak of hitting; correct in himself, then he releases; if he misses, he seeks the cause in himself. Every Japanese archery book of the 1920s and 1930s quotes those lines for exactly this idea, and the federation prints the chapter they come from as one of its two founding texts. The four characters are younger than they sound and the thing they compress is twenty-three centuries old.

References

  1. 「正射」・「正中」・「必中」・「正鵠」, 大辞泉・日本国語大辞典, at kotobank. https://kotobank.jp/word/正射 · https://kotobank.jp/word/正中 · https://kotobank.jp/word/必中
  2. 吳越春秋, 勾踐陰謀外傳, at zh.wikisource; 太平御覽, 卷348. https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/吳越春秋/勾踐陰謀外傳
  3. 禮記, 射義, at zh.wikisource. https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/禮記/射義
  4. 孟子, 公孫丑上, 7, at zh.wikisource. https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/孟子/公孫丑上
  5. 禮記, 中庸, at zh.wikisource. https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/禮記/中庸
  6. 論語, 八佾第三, 16, at zh.wikisource. https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/論語/八佾第三
  7. 日置流射学, 1918, scan 17. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/926697/1/17
  8. 現代の弓道, 1918, scan 135. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/955461/1/135
  9. 向陵誌 (第一高等学校), 1925, scan 381. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1915492/1/381
  10. 奉納の弓箭 (小西九兵衛編), 1924, scan 8. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/919326/1/8
  11. 小林治道, 竹林射法七道, 1931, scan 62. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1175325/1/62
  12. 竹内尉, 弓道読本：中等教科, 1937, scan 44. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1052433/1/44
  13. 女子弓道指針, 1938, scan 27. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1054810/1/27
  14. 弓道上達法, 1939, scan 15. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1266229/1/15
  15. 弓道講座, 1942, scan 44. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1053766/1/44
  16. 「阿波研造」, at ja.wikipedia. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/阿波研造
  17. National Diet Library Digital Collections, next-generation full-text search on 正射必中 and 正射正中 (0 each), against the well-covered pre-1946 window. https://lab.ndl.go.jp/dl/
  18. 自警, 50(5) and 50(10), 1968. National Diet Library Search catalogue.
  19. 士別弓道会, 正射必中：士別弓道会創立士別神社弓道場開設六十周年記念誌, 1992. National Diet Library Search catalogue.
  20. 全日本弓道連盟, 弓道の心. https://www.kyudo.jp/howto/
  21. 実用日本語表現辞典, 「正射必中」, at Weblio. https://www.weblio.jp/content/正射必中
  22. 弓引三昧, blog post, 12 October 2020. http://910.style.coocan.jp/1_yumi/20201012.html
  23. Yahoo!知恵袋, question, 20 May 2017. https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10174362265
  24. はぴるす, blog post, 7 February 2020. https://hapirusu.com/928/
  25. English Wikipedia, "Kyūdō" article, revision of 27 February 2005 (revid 10612621). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=10612621
  26. English Wikipedia, "Kyūdō" article, revision of 21 July 2008 (revid 227037862). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=227037862
  27. English Wikipedia, "Kyūdō" article, revision of 29 July 2022 (revid 1101052159). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1101052159
  28. Onuma Hideharu with Dan and Jackie DeProspero, Kyudo: The Essence and Practice of Japanese Archery, Kodansha International, 1993, p. 2, at Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/kyudoessenceprac00onum_0
  29. David E. Jones, Martial Arts Training in Japan, Tuttle, 2001, at Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/martialartstrain0000jone
  30. Jérôme Chouchan, Target: Business Wisdom from the Ancient Japanese Martial Art of Kyudo, LID, 2018, at Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/targetbusinesswi0000chou
  31. Niles and Dobson, MacArthur's War, Forge, 2007, at Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/macarthurswarnov00nile
  32. Paul Couch, The Art of War, Sweetwater Press, 2008, at Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/isbn_9781581736991
  33. Cindy Lin, Treasures of the Twelve, Harper, 2020, at Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/treasuresoftwelv0000linc

Authors

Tim Jackowski (Systems Architect, Takase Studios, LLC) · 典 Ten (Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, Takase Studios LLC)

AI written · Ten wrote the history. Tim Jackowski commissioned it and answers for it.

Checked · Claude Sonnet (Anthropic), 2026-09-15, citations — every claim tested at its address; some resolve; nothing found to differ; the rest not openable; the ANKF Kyudo Manual vol. 1 (1953) is the account's own stated null