Fine Japanese Calligraphy

The Art of Master Japanese Calligrapher Eri Takase

0
Visa, Mastercard, AmEx, PayPal accepted
Home › Library › Philology › Bashō - The old pond, a frog jumps in, the sound of water

古池や蛙飛込水の音 furu ike ya kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto Bashō - The old pond, a frog jumps in, the sound of water

古池や蛙飛込水の音 (furu ike ya kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto), an old pond, a frog and the sound of the water, is Bashō's, first printed in the spring of 1686 at the head of a contest of frog verses among his circle. Its history follows the text and its drafts, the Zen legend that grew up around it, and its renderings into English from 1932 to 2018.

Japanese Scroll of Bashō - The old pond, a frog jumps in, the sound of water (furu ike ya kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto) — Calligraphy by Eri Takase
Bashō - The old pond, a frog jumps in, the sound of water (furu ike ya kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto)

Haiku by Bashō on a traditional Japanese Scroll by Master Eri Takase.

View Scroll ›

Abstract

古池や蛙飛込水の音, the old pond. A frog jumps in, the sound of water, is the most famous verse in the language, first printed in the spring of 1686 at the head of 蛙合, the frog contest Senka 仙化 edited, which grew out of it, and that autumn in the anthology 春の日; two other forms survive beside it, a past-tense frog, 蛙飛ンだる, and a first line of yellow roses, 山吹や. Its story has grown two ways: a haikai anecdote, printed by Shikō 支考 in 1692, in which Kikaku 其角 proposed the yellow roses before Bashō chose the old pond; and a Zen legend, first a relic in 1795 and a full dialogue with the abbot Butchō in a book of 1868, one hundred and eighty-two years after the verse, which the translator Hiroaki Sato calls a hoax. English translators, from Miyamori's first anthology of renderings in 1932 to Sato in 2018, carried it into English, nearly all keeping the sound as the poem's last word.

Overview

The text. The scroll carries 古池や蛙飛込水の音. Hattori Kōseki 服部畊石 in 1932 prints the verse as the contest has it, 古池や蛙飛こむ水のおと, and Ebara Taizō 潁原退蔵 in 1947 prints it as 春の日 has it, 古池や蛙飛こむ水のをと, noting that 蛙合, 番匠童, 泊船集 and 千句塚 carry it too, 句形春の日に同じ, in the same form as 春の日 [1][2]. Beside it Ebara prints two other forms. 古池や蛙飛ンだる水の音, tagged to the anthology 庵桜, puts the leap in the past tense, a frog has jumped in; Hass, from Miner, has Bashō revising it several times, beginning with the frog leaping in the past tense [3]. 山吹や蛙飛込水の音, tagged to 暁山集, is the yellow-roses first line, and Ebara's note sends the reader to Shikō's 葛の松原 for the story of it [2]. Past those two forms, the witnesses differ only in how they write the middle word and the last. The Edo editions and the modern critical text write 飛こむ: the 1774 発句集, the 1783 第一義集, the 1795 俳翼, Bakin's 栞草 in its 1892 typesets, and NKBT 45 as Shirane's grammar cites it. The 1909 Zen lectures write 飛込む; the anthologies of 1911, 1927 and 1930 write 飛び込む, the full modern okurigana. The design's 飛込, with no okurigana at all, is in no verse witness, but it is what 三力's 1783 commentary writes when it names the word in prose, 飛込ハ蛙なり, so the tradition itself uses the form. One reading is not a variant. The 1774 manuscript-hand edition scans as 古池へ, into the old pond; the leaf shows や in a cursive hand, and the へ is the scanner's. The meter is five, seven, five: ふ・る・い・け・や, か・わ・ず・と・び・こ・む, み・ず・の・お・と.

The sense. The text has one sense and the tradition has spent three centuries deciding what to make of it. Shikō 支考 in 1719, as Shirane carries him, said that although it appears that the poem possesses absolutely no emotion, Bashō has managed to suggest 寂しさ, the quiet loneliness, and made it the type of the Bashō style [4]. Sanriki 三力 in 1783 made it a kōan and said the sound is the water's and the leap the frog's and the place the pond's, and that this is enough [5]. Sōen 宗演 in 1909 said no Japanese needs it explained [6]. Miyamori in 1932 said it is a verse for the ear [7]. Blyth in 1942 made the sound Plop! and gave the verse four readings [8]; in 1950, calling that explanation laboured, he heard the whole garden, the whole universe contained in one single plop [9]; and in 1963 he made a grammar of it: the pond, the leap and the sound coexistent, that is, coeternal, not cause and effect [10]. Hass in 1994 said the story of the Zen monk is a story, repeated in many books about Basho, and that the translation problem is 水の音 and the real fact is the drafts [3]. Shirane in 1998 read the verse as work done against the classical frog, the singing frog of the 古今集 beside its yellow roses, and said the loneliness the disciples heard is the recluse's ear [11]. Two things stand at the end of that. The verse is a sound, and everyone since 三力 has said so. And the enlightenment at the pond is a legend the translators themselves doubt: Blyth, of very doubtful authenticity, and in a way spoils the simplicity and apparent spontaneity of the original [12]; Hass, achieved instant enlightenment, etc. [3]

The words. 古池 is an old pond, and や sets it down as a thing in itself before anything happens in it. Blyth: the old pond is there; it exists in its own right … as we see by the particle ya [10]; Shirane's grammar of classical Japanese uses the line as its textbook instance of that や [11]. 蛙 is kawazu, the classical word for the frog, a spring season word; the 1927 全集 files the verse under it, and the 1686 contest was a contest on that topic. 飛込 is to leap in. 水の音 is the sound of the water, and Sanriki in 1783 lays the whole verse out in three sentences: 音ハ水なり。飛込ハ蛙なり。所ハ古池也, the sound is the water's; the leaping is the frog's; the place is the old pond [5]. Hass: the trick for translation is the last phrase … translators have tried water-sound, plop, splash, glub [3]. Miyamori: the verse appeals to the ear, not to the eye [7]. As words the line says: The old pond. A frog leaps in: the sound of the water.

The verse in English. Miyamori collected the verse's first English anthology in 1932, ten renderings beside his own [7]; Blyth translated it across eight books from 1942 to 1964 [8]; Henderson rendered it in 1934, 1945 and 1958 [13], Suzuki in 1950 and 1959 [14]; the translators after them carried it into English through 2018, nearly all keeping the sound as the last word.

The historical record

1686. 蛙合, the frog contest edited by Senka, and 春の日. The first printings, read here in the forms Hattori 1932 and Ebara 1947 print from them [1][2]. The contest opens on this verse, set on the left of the first round against Senka's いたいけに蝦つくばふ浮葉哉, endearingly, a frog crouches on a floating leaf, and the note on the round, as Hattori quotes it, declines to judge between them: 此二の蛙を何となく設たるに、四となり六となり成て一卷にみちぬ。かみにたち下におのの爭ふ事なかるべし, these two frogs were set down without design, and they became four, then six, and filled a scroll; the one set above and the one set below will not contend [1]. So the contest grew out of the verse, and Shirane has the disciples answering Bashō's hokku with frog poems of their own [11]. The accounts of its size disagree: Shirane gives twenty-four rounds and forty-one poets [11], Sato forty-one hokku judged in pairs, one left over, in the intercalary third month [15]. 春の日 followed that autumn, 同年秋出版 [1].

1774. Chōmu 五升庵蝶夢, 芭蕉翁発句集, the collected verse in a cursive hand. 古池や蛙飛こむ水の音, in a run of verses whose neighbors are dated 貞享三 and 四; the へ that appears in scanning is the scanner's, not the leaf's [16].

1783. Sanriki, 俳諧第一義集, a Zen reading of the haikai canon. The book's second volume opens on this verse under the headnote 水音大悟, great awakening at the sound of water, which is the compiler's and not the poet's, with furigana over every character, and a gloss that begins 轉る處實に能迷なり意味説とありといへども道躰の句, turned over, it truly baffles; though its meaning is said to be explained, it is a verse of the Way's own body, and reaches the three sentences quoted above, 音ハ水なり。飛込ハ蛙なり。所ハ古池也; know the first of them, he says, and you know the master's heart. The book is titled for the Zen 第一義 and reads the whole canon as kōan [5].

1795. Akisato Ritō 秋里籬島, 俳翼, a small book of haikai relics. On the right-hand page a single large character, 禪, with a short line of kanbun beneath it and the signature 釈氏佛頂書, so printed, written by the monk Butchō; on the left, 古池や蛙飛こむ水の音 芭蕉翁, and the note: 右此法語ハ鹿嶌根本寺佛頂和尚の真跡にして芭蕉翁に示し給ふ也於是古池の句あり, the dharma-words on the right are in the true hand of the abbot Butchō of 根本寺 at 鹿島 and were shown to the old master Bashō; upon this the old-pond verse came to be; then the provenance of the master's lifelong personal effects, 蕉翁生涯隨身の…, through 粟津正秀 to a Kyoto hermitage where they are kept as a family treasure. The earliest attestation on the desk of the Butchō story, and it is a relic-provenance with the verse attached, not yet a dialogue [17].

1810 and 1851. The 花屋日記's deathbed speech, and Takizawa Bakin 滝沢馬琴's 俳諧歳時記 as 藍亭青藍 enlarged it, 増補俳諧歳時記栞草, read in two typesets of 1892. The deathbed diary Bungyō 文暁 published in 1810 as 芭蕉翁反古文, later called the 花屋日記, has Bashō answer Mukai Kyorai 去来's request for a death-verse on the eighth day by naming this one: 古池や蛙飛ひ込む水の音此句に我一風を興せしより初めて辭世なり其後百千の句を吐くに此意ならざるはなし, "The old pond; a frog jumps in; the sound of the water": from this verse, in which I raised my own style, I had my death-verse for the first time, and of the hundreds and thousands of verses I have uttered since, none is without this meaning. The entry is signed 支考記, Shikō's record [18]. The 1851 enlargement prints the diary day by day under Bashō's memorial day, the speech with it, and writes the verse 蛙飛こむ [19]; Bakin's own entry of 1803, as an 1882 reprint without the enlargement prints it, is a few lines that send the reader to Kikaku's 終焉記 [20][21]. The diary is Bungyō's composition: Shida Gishū 志田義秀 in 1934, 今日ではその僞書であることが定說となつてゐる, today its being a forgery is the settled view [22]. So the speech is evidence for how the verse was regarded from 1810, not for anything Bashō said.

1868. Shunko 春湖, 芭蕉翁古池真傳, with capping phrases by the Zen master Kankei 環溪. A small book dated 慶應四年, 1868, compiled at 小築庵 in 深川 and signed 東京 小築庵春湖輯 [23]. It opens: 常州鹿嶋根本寺佛頂長老博覧大悟の知識なり桃青翁旧交の師たり, the elder Butchō of 根本寺 at 鹿島 in Hitachi was a widely read and greatly awakened teacher, an old master of Tōsei's, Tōsei being Bashō's early name. Butchō, newly moved to 長慶寺 in Fukagawa, comes to the Bashō hut; there are two exchanges, and then the third question, 如何是青苔未生前春雨未来前佛法, what is the Buddha-dharma before the green moss grows, before the spring rain comes?, at which a frog at the pond's edge leaps in and Bashō answers with the sound, 蛙飛込水の音; Butchō says 珍重珍重, well said, and gives him his 如意, the priest's ceremonial scepter. The disciples are then asked for the first five syllables: Sanpū 杉風 offers 宵闇, Ranran 嵐蘭 淋しさ, Kikaku 山吹や, and Bashō settles on 古池や. Every line carries Kankei's capping phrase in small type. It is the earliest full telling of the dialogue on the desk, one hundred and eighty-two years after the verse. Hiroaki Sato, who translates its opening, calls it a hoax that Kitsuda Shunkō (1815–86) concocted, seizing on the by then standard Zen interpretation of the verse [24].

1909. Sōen, 無門関講義, a Zen abbot's lectures on the Gateless Gate. 古池や蛙飛込む水の音と云ふ意味が分らぬと頌の意味は分らぬ, without understanding the meaning of "the old pond", one cannot understand the meaning of a Zen verse; and, 鳥渡した發句位は誰でも知てをる, everyone knows at least a hokku or two, "the old pond" …, its meaning received by every Japanese as if by heredity [6].

1911, 1927. 日本文学史講義; Shimada Seihō 島田青峰, 芭蕉俳句紀行全集. The verse in the literary-history lecture with 物言へば唇寒し秋のかせ, and in the 全集 under the season word 蛙, both in the full modern form 飛び込む [25][26].

1930. 釈宗演全集, the abbot's collected works. The Butchō story as the abbot told it: Butchō asks 靑苔未だ生せず、春雨未だ來らざる時如何, what of the time before the moss grows and the spring rain comes?, and Bashō answers with the last twelve syllables only, 蛙飛び込む水の音; then he commands his disciples to supply the first five, and 淋しさや and 宵暗や come from unnamed pupils, 山吹や from Kikaku, and 古池や from Bashō himself; since it came about this way it of course contains Zen meaning. It is the 1868 telling, with the disciples' names dropped, told by a Zen abbot to a Zen audience [27].

The attribution. The verse is Bashō's from its first appearance and no one has ever said otherwise. Shirane dates it to the spring of 1686 on two printed witnesses of that year: 春の日, the anthology of the Bashō school, and 蛙合, the frog contest edited by Senka, where the verse stands on the left of the first round against Senka's own frog on a floating leaf [11]; Hattori 1932 and Ebara 1947 give both books' text [1][2]. The 1774 発句集 sets the verse among neighbors dated 貞享三 and 貞享四, 1686 and 1687, which agrees [16]. Everything after that is about how the verse came to be, and there the record splits into a haikai story and a Zen story. The haikai story is the drafts: Kikaku proposing 山吹や, yellow roses, as the first line, which would have tied the frog to its classical association with the mountain rose, and Bashō choosing 古池や instead. Shirane carries it according to one source [11]; the source is Shikō's 葛の松原 of 1692, which Hattori quotes: the master had the seven-and-five, 蛙飛こむ水の音, first, 晋子が傍に侍りて、山吹といふ五文字をかふむらしめむかと、およづけ侍るに、唯古池とはさだまりぬ, Kikaku, beside him, suggested crowning it with the five syllables "yellow roses", but it was settled simply as "old pond" [1][28]. Hattori also prints a letter over Bashō's name, dated the spring of 1685, that sends a correspondent the new first line in place of the earlier yellow-roses verse, and doubts it, since the Kikaku journey it mentions does not fit that year [1]. Hass, from Miner, has Bashō revising it several times, beginning with the frog leaping in the past tense [3], the 飛ンだる form Ebara prints [2]. The Zen story is Butchō, the abbot of 根本寺 at 鹿島 with whom Bashō studied, and a kōan exchange; its earliest attestation is 1795, in a form that is not yet a dialogue [17], and its full form is the book of 1868 [23]. The Kikaku element is common to both stories and is the one piece with a footing in the haikai record. The English translators, from the ten Miyamori collected in 1932 to Hass in 1994, all give the verse to Bashō, and the ones who tell the Zen story doubt it as they tell it.

What is not a source. The Butchō story is a legend, told in three forms that do not agree: a relic with a verse attached in 1795, a kōan dialogue with the disciples' drafts in 1868, and a set of drafts without a monk in Shikō's 葛の松原, Shirane and Hass. The 1868 telling supplies the dialogue, the names and the drafts the 1795 one lacks, which is what a legend does as it grows. The one element with a footing in the haikai record is Kikaku's 山吹や, and it stands on Shikō's account of 1692. The headnote 水音大悟 is the 1783 compiler's. Bakin's deathbed speech is the 花屋日記's. The surveys of its translations, Sato's hundred frogs among them, are reception, not sources. The verse's sources are the two books of 1686, whose text Hattori and Ebara print.

The verse in English

1932. 宮森麻太郎 Asatarō Miyamori, An Anthology of Haiku Ancient and Modern, Maruzen, Tokyo, no. 20, printed pages 130–133. His own two renderings and, on one spread, ten more collected from Nitobe, Saitō, Toyoda, Chamberlain, Page, Walsh, Noguchi, Porter, Aston and Revon in French, with the note that the verse appeals to the ear. The first anthology of the verse's English [7].

1934. Harold G. Henderson, The Bamboo Broom, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, page 33. the haiku that Bashō himself considered the standard for his new style: An ancient pond; / Plash of the water / When a frog jumps in [13].

1942. R. H. Blyth, Zen in English Literature and Oriental Classics, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, pages 217–224. His first rendering, which he calls unconventional: The old pond. / A frog jumps in— / Plop!, with the case for it, The English "sound of the water" is too gentle … The Japanese word "oto" has an onomatopoeic value much nearer to "plop.", and then four readings of the verse over eight pages, among them a symbolic one he says he has just invented [8].

1945. Harold G. Henderson, Handbook of Japanese Grammar, Routledge. The same verse re-lineated as the example of exclamatory や: An ancient pond! / And the plash of the water / When a frog jumps in! [29]

1949. R. H. Blyth, Haiku, volume 1, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, pages 277, 318, 340 and 373. The old pond; / A frog jumps in,— / The sound of the water, first on page 277 with the Japanese, under The following account is given of the creation of Bashō's, and the account is the Zen one, of Butchō; of it he says, It is of very doubtful authenticity, and in a way spoils the simplicity and apparent spontaneity of the original. The same lines stand on pages 318 and 373, and on page 340 with a colon after the pond [12].

1950. R. H. Blyth, Haiku, volume 2, Spring, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, pages 253–254. The 1949 rendering with a colon after the pond, among the frogs, and his reading of it: The whole garden, the whole universe contained in one single plop!—sound that is beyond sound and silence, and yet is the sound of the water of the old pond. A note says the 1942 book gave a laboured explanation occupying eight pages, and I have changed my mind about it [9].

1950. D. T. Suzuki, Essays in Zen Buddhism, Second Series, Rider, London. 'Tis an ancient pond, / A frog leaps in— / Oh, the sound of water!, and It was this sound that awakened him to the truth of Zen Buddhism. The Zen account, from the man who fixed it in English [14].

1952. R. H. Blyth, Haiku, volume 4, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo. The same rendering again [30].

1958. Harold G. Henderson, An Introduction to Haiku, Doubleday Anchor, pages 19–20. Early in 1686 Bashō wrote what is probably the best-known haiku in the Japanese language; the literal Old pond: / frog jump-in / water-sound.; the account of the composition, the last two lines were the first to be composed … The circumstances seem well attested, Bashō in his garden with friends, the sound necessarily during a period of silence, and then, if this story is correct, the closest possible English: Old pond— / and a frog-jump-in / water-sound [31].

1959. D. T. Suzuki, Zen and Japanese Culture, Princeton University Press (Bollingen), pages 227–228 and 238–239. Furu ike ya! / Kawazu tobikomu, / Mizu no oto. — The old pond, ah! / A frog jumps in: / The water's sound!, said to have been the start of his revolutionary movement; then the Bucchō story told in full, and the reading in which the sound was heard by Bashō as filling the entire universe and the poet was "resurrected." The source most later English writers argue with [32].

1960. R. H. Blyth, Japanese Life and Character in Senryu, Hokuseido Press. The Japanese printed 古池や蛙飛びこむ水の音, romaji, and his 1949 rendering, as the model of a senryū [33].

1962. R. H. Blyth, Zen and Zen Classics, volume 5, Hokuseido Press. The old pond! / A frog-jumps-in sound / Of the water., with the grammar spelled out: "A frog jumps in" is not a clause but an adjectival phrase qualifying "sound." [34]

1963. R. H. Blyth, A History of Haiku, volume 1, Hokuseido Press, pages 11–12 and 96. The coeternal reading in full (The old pond is there; it exists in its own right … The old pond continues in time; the jumping in and the sound of the water are timeless), and, in a note on page 96, the date, Bashō wrote Furu-ike ya, the foundation of the Bashō School, in 1686 [10].

1964. R. H. Blyth, A History of Haiku, volume 2, Hokuseido Press. The same rendering again [35].

1966. Nobuyuki Yuasa, The Narrow Road to the Deep North and Other Travel Sketches, Penguin, pages 9 and 32. Four lines, Breaking the silence / Of an ancient pond, / A frog jumped into water — / A deep resonance., given twice, the second time with a comment by one of his disciples, Shikō's account [36].

1967. John C. H. Wu, The Golden Age of Zen. An old pond. / A frog jumps in,— / Plop!, read as a Chinese couplet: The old pond corresponds to "An eternity of endless space," while the frog jumping in … is equivalent to "A day of wind and moon." [37]

1976. Donald Keene, World Within Walls, Grove Press, pages 88–89. The ancient pond— / A frog jumps in, / The sound of the water., Shikō's Kuzu no Matsubara (1692) account with Kikaku's yellow roses, and the caution: If this account can be trusted, the verse may have been written as far back as 1682, though not published until 1686. It is hard to imagine, however, that such a masterpiece would have been left in manuscript for four years [28].

1982. Makoto Ueda, Matsuo Bashō, Kodansha International, page 53. The old pond— / A frog leaps in, / And a splash [38].

1982. Janine Beichman, Masaoka Shiki, Twayne, note 6. The old pond! / A frog jumps in— / the sound of water., and the fact that the Old Pond Church (古池教会) dedicated to Bashō's worship was at one point recognized by the government (Keene 2013 gives the year, 1885) [39].

1983. Hiroaki Sato, One Hundred Frogs: From Renga to Haiku to English, Weatherhill, chapter 7, pages 147–148. The book began as a collection of English translations of this verse, from a list of about twenty that Kyoko Selden sent him; far more translations have been found than I had expected. His own: An old pond: a frog jumps in—the sound of water. His argument that 蛙 may be plural (Sanpū's stocked ponds; Kyorai's croaking paddy in the same 蛙合), with the 蛙合 pairing against Senka's Innocently a frog squats on a floating leaf; and the correction that 水の音 is not, as sometimes translated, onomatopoeic [15].

1985. Lucien Stryk, On Love and Barley, University of Hawaii Press, number 153. Old pond, / leap-splash— / a frog. The rendering the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (8th edition, 2014) prints under Bashō [40].

1985. William J. Higginson, The Haiku Handbook, McGraw-Hill, page 9. old pond . . . / a frog leaps in / water's sound, the dots marking the kireji, and the note that Bashō moved from frogs' songs to frogs' actions [41].

1992. Makoto Ueda, Bashō and His Interpreters, Stanford University Press, page 140. the old pond— / a frog jumps in, / water's sound, and the commentators, Shiki first: no poem can be simpler than this; it is why this poem is impossible to imitate. Page 8: Hearn saw more than one frog in this poem [42].

1994. Robert Hass, The Essential Haiku, Ecco Press, pages 17 and 257. The old pond—/ a frog jumps in, / sound of water, and the note on 水の音, the drafts and the legend [3].

1994. John Stevens, The Sword of No-Sword, Shambhala, page 72. The old pond: / a frog leaps in / the sound of water., under Tesshū's calligraphy of the verse on a Zeshin painting [43].

1996. Hiroaki Sato, Bashō's Narrow Road, Stone Bridge Press. One line, An old pond: a frog jumps into the water the sound; the note that the pond may have been one of the manmade ponds of Sanpū's fish business, and the 1868 hoax, a forged old pond tradition published by Kitsuda Shunkō [24].

1998. Haruo Shirane, Traces of Dreams, Stanford University Press, pages 14–17, 51 and 76–77. an old pond … / a frog leaps in, / the sound of water; the dating to 1686 and the contest; the reading against the classical frog [11].

1998. Sam Hamill, The Essential Bashō, Shambhala, page 117. At the ancient pond / a frog plunges into / the sound of water [44].

2003. Cid Corman, One Man's Moon, Gnomon Press, page 18. old pond / frog leaping / splash, with his note that the verse could even be written as one word [45].

2004. David Landis Barnhill, Bashō's Haiku, SUNY Press, number 180, and introduction pages 9 and 12–13. old pond— / a frog jumps in, / water's sound, dated 1686; and the deliberately prosaic alternative he sets against it, sitting by an old pond / a frog jumps in / giving off the sound of water, to show what statement does to the image [46].

2005. Haruo Shirane, Classical Japanese: A Grammar, Columbia University Press. The verse as the grammar's example of や, with the critical text 古池や蛙飛こむ水の音 cited to NKBT 45:37 [47].

2008. Jane Reichhold, Bashō: The Complete Haiku, Kodansha USA, number 152, notes. old pond / a frog jumps into / the sound of water; her note dates it 1681–82—spring and says it was first published in a selection of single verses in Haru no Hi (Spring Day), against the 1686 of Henderson, Blyth, Keene, Shirane and the date given above. Her Shikō paraphrase has Bashō calling 山吹 elegant but too showy and 古池 simple and truthful [48].

2009. Stephen Addiss, Haiku: An Anthology of Japanese Poems, Shambhala. The literal Old pond— / a frog jumps in / the sound of water with the word-by-word gloss; the parodies of Bōsai and Sengai (Old pond— / something has PLOP / just jumped in; Old pond— / Bashō jumps in / the sound of water); Nobutane's comparison with Hakuin's one hand; and Hakuin's own inscription on a Bashō portrait, he heard a frog jump into the water and dropped off mind and body [49].

2012. Stephen Addiss, The Art of Haiku, Shambhala. The same material, in the later book [50].

2013. Donald Keene, The Winter Sun Shines In: A Life of Masaoka Shiki, Columbia University Press, pages 97–99. Shiki's essay in English: The meaning of the verse about the old pond is nothing more than what appears on the surface. It has no other meaning … it hides nothing, covers nothing, does not use the slightest artifice, contains not one ambiguous word. Then Shikō's 1692 account in Keene's rendering, and Keene's own dissent: it is hard to agree that Bashō's only aim was to achieve realism … "the yellow roses" that Kikaku had proposed would have ruined the poem [51].

2018. Hiroaki Sato, On Haiku, New Directions. jumps in the water, one line; the reading of the verse as a host's self-deprecation to his guests [52].

A reading

I read the verse as Sanriki did in 1783 and as Hass did in 1994, which is the same reading two hundred years apart: the sound is the water's, the leap is the frog's, the place is the pond, and that is the poem. In the spring of 1686 Bashō's circle answered this verse with frogs of their own, and it was set on the left of the first round against a frog on a floating leaf; and in the same year, if the one anecdote with a haikai footing is right, Kikaku wanted the first line to be yellow roses, the pretty association every reader expected, and Bashō chose an old pond instead. That is the whole revolution of the verse, done in five syllables, and a legend about a Zen master asking about moss is smaller than it. The Zen story should be told as legend, with its 1795 and 1868 tellings, or not told; it should not be told as fact. The design's 飛込 is the tightest of four writings of one word and has a footing in 1783 prose; the 1774 へ is a scanner's ghost, now seen off by the leaf.

References

  1. 服部畊石 Hattori Kōseki『芭蕉句集新講』上巻, 四条書房, 1932, pp. 196–200. National Diet Library pid 1145820, scans 104–106. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1145820/1/104
  2. 潁原退蔵 Ebara Taizō 編著『新校芭蕉俳句全集』, 全国書房, 1947, p. 20. National Diet Library pid 1128353, scan 22. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1128353/1/22
  3. Robert Hass, The Essential Haiku, Ecco Press, 1994, pp. 17 and 257.
  4. 支考 Shikō, quoted by Haruo Shirane, Traces of Dreams, Stanford University Press, 1998.
  5. 鼻中庵三力 Sanriki『俳諧第一義集』, 1783. National Diet Library pid 2568263, scan 2. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/2568263/1/2
  6. 釈宗演 Shaku Sōen『無門関講義』, 1909. National Diet Library pid 899779, scan 49. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/899779/1/49
  7. Asatarō Miyamori, An Anthology of Haiku Ancient and Modern, Maruzen, Tokyo, 1932, no. 20, pp. 130–133.
  8. R. H. Blyth, Zen in English Literature and Oriental Classics, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, 1942, pp. 217–224.
  9. R. H. Blyth, Haiku, vol. 2, Spring, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, 1950, pp. 253–254.
  10. R. H. Blyth, A History of Haiku, vol. 1, Hokuseido Press, 1963, pp. 11–12 and 96 n. 1.
  11. Haruo Shirane, Traces of Dreams, Stanford University Press, 1998, pp. 14–17, 51, 76–77.
  12. R. H. Blyth, Haiku, vol. 1, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, 1949, pp. 277, 318, 340, 373.
  13. Harold G. Henderson, The Bamboo Broom, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1934, p. 33.
  14. D. T. Suzuki, Essays in Zen Buddhism, Second Series, Rider, London, 1950.
  15. Hiroaki Sato, One Hundred Frogs: From Renga to Haiku to English, Weatherhill, 1983, ch. 7, pp. 147–148.
  16. 五升庵蝶夢 Chōmu『芭蕉翁発句集』, 1774. National Diet Library pid 2540314, scan 22. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/2540314/1/22
  17. 秋里籬島 Akisato Ritō『俳翼』, 1795. National Diet Library pid 2541278, scan 7. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/2541278/1/7
  18. 『芭蕉翁花屋日記』, 晩鐘会, 1902, printed pages 20–21. National Diet Library pid 875665, scan 15. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/875665/1/15
  19. 滝沢馬琴 Takizawa Bakin 編, 藍亭青藍 補『俳諧歳時記栞草』 (1851), 1892 typeset. National Diet Library pid 875335, scan 92. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/875335/1/92
  20. 滝沢馬琴 編『俳諧歳時記』 冬之部, 柳原喜兵衛等, 1882, 芭蕉忌. National Diet Library pid 875326, scan 7. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/875326/1/7
  21. 石川八朗, 「俳諧歳時記」, 改訂新版 世界大百科事典, at kotobank (1803; the 1851 enlargement by 藍亭青藍). https://kotobank.jp/word/俳諧歳時記
  22. 志田義秀, 「花屋日記」, in 藤村作 編『日本文学大辞典』, 新潮社, 1934, page 387. National Diet Library pid 1235690, scan 434. https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/1235690/1/434
  23. 春湖 Shunko 輯, 環溪 Kankei 着語『芭蕉翁古池真傳』, 慶應四年 (1868). 八戸市立図書館 copy, 国文学研究資料館 国書データベース, canvases 5–8. https://doi.org/10.20730/100132525
  24. Hiroaki Sato, Bashō's Narrow Road, Stone Bridge Press, 1996.
  25. 『日本文学史講義』, 1911. National Diet Library pid 903544, scan 79.
  26. 島田青峰 Shimada Seihō 編『芭蕉俳句紀行全集』, 1927. National Diet Library pid 1194541, scan 24.
  27. 『釈宗演全集』, 1930. National Diet Library pid 1181336, scan 157.
  28. Donald Keene, World Within Walls, Grove Press, 1976, pp. 88–89.
  29. Harold G. Henderson, Handbook of Japanese Grammar, Routledge, 1945.
  30. R. H. Blyth, Haiku, vol. 4, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, 1952.
  31. Harold G. Henderson, An Introduction to Haiku, Doubleday Anchor, 1958, pp. 19–20.
  32. D. T. Suzuki, Zen and Japanese Culture, Princeton University Press (Bollingen), 1959, pp. 227–228 and 238–239.
  33. R. H. Blyth, Japanese Life and Character in Senryu, Hokuseido Press, 1960.
  34. R. H. Blyth, Zen and Zen Classics, vol. 5, Hokuseido Press, 1962.
  35. R. H. Blyth, A History of Haiku, vol. 2, Hokuseido Press, 1964.
  36. Nobuyuki Yuasa, The Narrow Road to the Deep North and Other Travel Sketches, Penguin, 1966, pp. 9 and 32.
  37. John C. H. Wu, The Golden Age of Zen, 1967.
  38. Makoto Ueda, Matsuo Bashō, Kodansha International, 1982, p. 53.
  39. Janine Beichman, Masaoka Shiki, Twayne, 1982, note 6.
  40. Lucien Stryk, On Love and Barley, University of Hawaii Press, 1985, no. 153.
  41. William J. Higginson, The Haiku Handbook, McGraw-Hill, 1985, p. 9.
  42. Makoto Ueda, Bashō and His Interpreters, Stanford University Press, 1992, pp. 8 and 140.
  43. John Stevens, The Sword of No-Sword, Shambhala, 1994, p. 72.
  44. Sam Hamill, The Essential Bashō, Shambhala, 1998, p. 117.
  45. Cid Corman, One Man's Moon, Gnomon Press, 2003, p. 18.
  46. David Landis Barnhill, Bashō's Haiku, SUNY Press, 2004, no. 180, pp. 9, 12–13.
  47. Haruo Shirane, Classical Japanese: A Grammar, Columbia University Press, 2005.
  48. Jane Reichhold, Bashō: The Complete Haiku, Kodansha USA, 2008, no. 152.
  49. Stephen Addiss, Haiku: An Anthology of Japanese Poems, Shambhala, 2009.
  50. Stephen Addiss, The Art of Haiku, Shambhala, 2012.
  51. Donald Keene, The Winter Sun Shines In: A Life of Masaoka Shiki, Columbia University Press, 2013, pp. 97–99.
  52. Hiroaki Sato, On Haiku, New Directions, 2018.

Authors

Tim Jackowski (Systems Architect, Takase Studios, LLC) · 典 Ten (Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, Takase Studios LLC)

AI written · Ten wrote the history. Tim Jackowski commissioned it and answers for it.

Checked · grok-4.6 (xAI), 2026-09-05, citations · gpt-6-astra (OpenAI), 2026-09-05, citations · Claude Sonnet (Anthropic), 2026-09-14, citations — every claim tested at its address; most resolve; several readings resolve but differ, now corrected in the body — Miyamori's page citation mistook a numbered item for a page and is fixed, Keene's quoted bracket restored to the source's wording, and Satō's 'in the water' corrected to 'into the water'; one claim does not resolve — the Bakin deathbed passage sits at a different page image than cited, now corrected; the rest not openable — leaves absent from what was provided, the harvest-index instrument, live pages, and the house's own unquoted English